Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

• FauxPseudo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  My statement that I’m quoting predates this paper. My statement exists completely independent of this paper ever being produced. My statement is not about this paper. My statement is about the state of AI and the industry. This paper reinforces my statement.

  source

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    How so?

    source

    • FauxPseudo@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.

      I’m unclear on if we’re having a good faith conversation because I thought that would have been very clear from the beginning.

      source

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        You said: I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.

        You’re also saying: My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.

        I can’t make sense of what you are trying to say.

        source

        • -> View More Comments