Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 days agoSeriously, I’m not qualified. No amount of appendix prompts and Dunning Kruger is going to change that.
I’m not demanding anything. I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You think the paper is fraud?
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My statement that I’m quoting predates this paper. My statement exists completely independent of this paper ever being produced. My statement is not about this paper. My statement is about the state of AI and the industry. This paper reinforces my statement.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
How so?
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.
I’m unclear on if we’re having a good faith conversation because I thought that would have been very clear from the beginning.