Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 days agoYou said: I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.
You’re also saying: My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.
I can’t make sense of what you are trying to say.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Did you see the “or” in my first statement?
General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I still can’t make sense of what you are trying to say.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I set up two different, not necessarily exclusive, options. Either it can’t do what they say or it can. If it can’t then that’s one issue. If it can then the people with something to prove aren’t stepping up to show us its potential. There could be multiple motivations behind that. But as it stands right now we just know that it’s not being used to do what they claim.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Wait. How do we know this? Besides, these researchers show that it is possible, not that it is established practice.