Comment on š² mg
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
We have no evidence these dinosaurs didnāt wear adorable hats made from compostable materials
Comment on š² mg
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
We have no evidence these dinosaurs didnāt wear adorable hats made from compostable materials
marcos@lemmy.world āØ20ā© āØhoursā© ago
There is analysis of soft material around some fossils.
We know that they didnāt all wear adorable hats mode from compostable materials.
TheFogan@programming.dev āØ19ā© āØhoursā© ago
More accurately they didnāt all, ALWAYS wear adorable hats. It very well could be the norm, just not when treking through the tar pits⦠or just coincidentally the .00001% that actually fosilized in ways to give analysis of soft materials happened to have left their hats at home.
DancingBear@midwest.social āØ15ā© āØhoursā© ago
Adorable hats are most likely not conducive to allowing the wearer to be fossilized.
TheFogan@programming.dev āØ15ā© āØhoursā© ago
True⦠humans wear adorable hats all the time, yet Iāve never seen a report of a fossilized human found wearing an adorable hat.
dharmacurious@slrpnk.net āØ17ā© āØhoursā© ago
In fact, we know that they did wear adorable hats made from compostable materials. Itās just that the hats were extremely valuable, and so whenever we find dead dinos without their hats it is likely because of grave robbing, or potentially even that they were murdered for their hats. Held at claw point, and marched into the tar pits, all for the hats so they proudly wore.
Source: visions
Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works āØ19ā© āØhoursā© ago
Well, not all the time anyway.
marcos@lemmy.world āØ19ā© āØhoursā© ago
Oh, right. Not all of them or not all of the time. At least one of those.