Comment

The correct understanding of NFTs has always been trivial: they’re certificates. What they certify is not determined.

Anyone telling you anything else is either lying, or a moron (or has been lied to, which is not incompatible with being a moron).

Sort:hotnew top

VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
The type of use case I see it could be good for is Software ownership. One could sell his copy of a game or give it to someone else by exchanging the token and the software could use it to validate ownership.

source
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Yuppp

source
- Agrivar@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Let it go man, the NFTs aren’t coming back.
  
  source
  - Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Good ideas never die ;)
    
    To be clear I didn’t get into “NFTs” during the craze at all because I knew what NFTs are supposed to be and personalized pictures of monkeys is not it.
    
    At the same time it was hilarious how stupid the arguments on both sides were.
    
    source
  - FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    You sound like someone who thinks an nft is something other than a certificate.
    
    source
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
It’s a bitcoin that can’t be swapped for other bitcoins, right?

source
- FishFace@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Yes that’s also true… I would venture that it’s not as useful in general to understand the concept though :)
  
  source