The earliest draft title seems to be “FBI Subpoenaed X To Get Grok Prompts Used To Create Nonconsensual Porn”
Which, in my opinion, is more technically correct (especially for a draft) but a whole lot harder to parse. They interacted with the Grok makers, which is kind of what I assumed
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yeah, there’s no fucking way “Well Grok told me these are the prompts they used” would be admissible as evidence of any kind.
Tetragrade@leminal.space 1 day ago
@Grok@twitter.com is this true?