Comment on Using huntarr? Perhaps you shouldn't.
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
Looks like Huntarr’s presence on Github is suddenly gone and their sub went private.
Comment on Using huntarr? Perhaps you shouldn't.
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
Looks like Huntarr’s presence on Github is suddenly gone and their sub went private.
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’m not so much worried about ‘vibe coding’ as long as the dev actually knows the validity of the code presented in the LLM. At that point, the LLM becomes the assistant, not the dev itself. However, if I were to speculate, this dev team didn’t, got called on it, didn’t know how to respond or validate the code, so they closed up shop.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
The term ‘vibe coding’ I think was originally about generating and using code without understanding it
irmadlad@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Well, I have used LLM to do code for in house type stuff. Very simple. In that scenario, it’s fairly good. I’ve found that LLM are good at compose files for instance. But that’s much different than producing a piece of software for thousands of people to use with confidence. Especially when dealing with anything 'arr and the mitigation that takes place to operate that in a secure, private, and anonymous manner.
orgrinrt@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah doesn’t sound like vibe coding if you actually go through the necessary dances anyway, i.e double-check the produced code and validate it and actually understand it and the domain.