IIRC, the last time I used a new install of LO for the first time, it asked me which interface I preferred instead of defaulting to the old one.
Comment on LibreOffice blasts 'fake open source' OnlyOffice for working with Microsoft to lock users in
bufalo1973@piefed.social 19 hours agoLO also has the ribbon interface. But not by default.
grue@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
tackleberry@thelemmy.club 11 hours ago
Good. Those that want it can enable it. I don’t. Takes up too much screen space showing a lot of unnecessary icons
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
True, but it is a purely aesthetic rearrangement of the menus. It doesn’t make it any more straightforward to navigate. Plus it doesn’t really function correctly on Windows (and it takes up just as much screen space).
It was a good step when they rolled it out about a decade ago, but they still haven’t done the work to make it better organized or show appropriate hierarchy.
rzadkie@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
but it is a purely aesthetic rearrangement of the menus
And what do you think gui is?
gedaliyah@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
As per my previous comment, it should offer reasonable use of screen space, visual hierarchy, and well-reasoned organization. Moving bad menus to a different arrangement on the screen doesn’t magically make them into good menus.
As a first step, it was a good move, although it was a decade late when it came out. They still haven’t done a major redesign another decade on.
Dojan@pawb.social 8 hours ago
The Ribbon interface is terrible, though. The styles selector doesn’t fit the entire button, and it also doesn’t resize with your window size, remaining super tiny not capable of displaying three full options simultaneously. Image
Word at least got that right.
Image
My preferred layout is Sidebar, but even there the style is just a regular dropdown. LibreOffice is fantastic, but they need to put some more work into UX.