Comment on Judge scolds Mark Zuckerberg's team for wearing Meta glasses to social media trial
73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks agoI don’t know if it was intentional marketing but it does have that effect and was kinda pointless. I assume people have camera phones in the courtroom with them too but possessing a device that can record doesn’t mean you intend to do it and I doubt Meta has tampered with their glasses so if they were to do that it would be noticeable thanks to the recording LED…
Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Go onto a court room and hold up your phone, pointing at the jury. Report back on how that goes for you.
ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
I know where I live you can’t even take a phone into the courthouse; they have signs on the door and will turn you around at the metal detectors for having one. The fact that they got those glasses into the courtroom at all is a security fail at best, and feels more like a contempt of court charge.
73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
and do the released facts say someone was pointing a camera at the jury and the scolding happened as a result of that?
KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
They were wearing glasses with the camera literally built into them. Anywhere they look they are pointing a camera.
73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 weeks ago
Again, there was nothing about them looking at something in particular or anything suggesting the intent to film. As I said it is very easy to know if the camera is activated.