Really can’t be overstated how different “female circumcision” is from the male version.
Like comparing ear piercings to ear cropping.
Comment on Texas Republican Primary having a normal one
officermike@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Good thing we only mutilate boys’ genitals.
Really can’t be overstated how different “female circumcision” is from the male version.
Like comparing ear piercings to ear cropping.
Saying they’re the same is bad but comparing circumcision to ear piercing is even worse. Piercings heal, that foreskin is gone forever.
Speak for yourself. My dad gave me mine on my 18th birthday and i planted it in the garden.
You sprout some wood?
So do you think the mild forms of FGM should be allowed because those are pretty comparable to the male one? Personally I think both should be banned.
I think banning circumcision runs you into many of the same problems that are encountered with banning abortion or gender transition. Or tattoos and ear piercings, for that matter. Or drinking.
You can scare physicians/professionals into refusing to perform it. But then you deal with all the amateurs and their consequences.
Gender transition and abortion are also illegal to do without consent
They should both be banned
Please elaborate on how Type IIa (by World Health Organization standards) differs so greatly.
Please elaborate on how Type IIa
defined as the removal of the labia minora
two hairless, highly sensitive cutaneous folds located within the labia majora, surrounding the vaginal and urethral openings
:-/
Hmm, since prepuce (foreskin) is a hairless, highly-sensitive cutaneous fold covering and protecting the glans, why is it okay to remove one, but not the other? Or, since they derive from the same zygotic tissue and are homologous, why is it not okay to excise the clitoral hood?
I keep asking these questions, and nobody ever has a good answer, and the only difference that I can divine is that one is okay because it’s done to boys.
Thank you for mentioning this. I don’t even have that set of equipment, and it boggles my mind that this is normal and acceptable to anyone. Even using religion as a reason just seems ridiculous. Why the hell would you ever cause that much physical pain to a child for a cosmetic procedure?
“Oh, they’re transing the kids!” Fucker, you asked your doctor to cut off part of your son’s junk before he even developed the capacity to lift his own head. Shut the fuck up.
Haha, oh honey circumcision may be the most common genital mutilation procedure, but wait til you learn how those transphobic motherfuckers write exceptions for coercive intersex surgeries into their anti trans laws.
Fokeu@lemmy.zip 21 hours ago
It’s still shocking to me how most Americans consider genital mutilation a normal thing.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 33 minutes ago
My mutilated american dick thanks you for your concern 😔
taiyang@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
If it shocks you farther, it’s just a little check box when you have a baby boy. Just a little bit of the paperwork before discharge. You don’t even have to be there, and it’s free. Very strange, all things considered.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 hour ago
I watched my little boy like a hawk so they wouldn’t “accidentally” whisk him away and mutilate him.
porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 20 hours ago
Free? Free?!! In a hospital, in the U S of A?!!! Ok now I’m really shocked.
MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 hours ago
It’s not free. It costs hundreds of dollars. The user above may have had it covered by insurance, but that’s a different thing. Entirely NOT free
tomiant@piefed.social 18 hours ago
Do you get to keep the leftovers?
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Only at hospitals that decline to accept tips.
taiyang@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Nah… they let you keep the placenta, sure, but the doc gets to keep the foreskin for their special baby skin leather doctor’s coats.