Comment on [deleted]
lena@gregtech.eu 5 weeks agoYou can do both :P
And by both I mean choosing the lesser evil and doing direct action
Comment on [deleted]
lena@gregtech.eu 5 weeks agoYou can do both :P
And by both I mean choosing the lesser evil and doing direct action
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks ago
If you do one, you won’t need to bother with the other.
lena@gregtech.eu 5 weeks ago
But it does increase your chances of success. Make use of the little power you’re given
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks ago
If anything it lowers it because centrists like all right-wingers stop caring once they’re not personally affected.
lena@gregtech.eu 5 weeks ago
So you’d rather go against a full-on right winger or fascist?
PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Naivete at it’s finest. Reality is that the choices available to you will never conform to all of your desires, so in that sense, a choice is always going to be for the lesser evil. If you think there’s an action you can take to avoid making a choice at all, then reality will disabuse you of that notion as well.
Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 weeks ago
It’s naive to think your only choice is to follow a binary option given to you.
PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
No part of my statement said there were only two choices. It was in regard to all choices.
NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That is literally how the U.S. election system works. It’s naive to think you have other options. You’re just an unrealistic idealist accomplishing nothing.