As much as I would like to see that happen paying to fight a court case against Conde Nast just to get a retraction that they will stick somewhere invisible doesn’t really sound like a winning formula.
Libel. Taking it down doesn’t undo the damage to reputation which libel is concerned with.
tempest@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
underisk@lemmy.ml 8 hours ago
Letting them win because you’ve canceled before even playing is also a losing formula. Even if they don’t get awarded monetary damages they can probably at least get their legal expenses covered.
jve@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
They pulled the article. What more are you hoping for?
xvapx@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
could maybe force Ars to put out a retraction
Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 5 hours ago
How about getting them to put an “e” after the “s” in their name instead?
TAG@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
In the US, libel requires you to prove that the writer knew that what they were writing is not true and that they did it to hurt you. Doing lazy research and trusting an AI is not going to meet that standard.