Comment on Kid Rock is the people version of an above ground pool
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 day agoIt actually saves on resources because it’s not loading in CSS and JS. Also I like the look, been using boost long before it was a Lemmy client.
Comment on Kid Rock is the people version of an above ground pool
spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 day agoIt actually saves on resources because it’s not loading in CSS and JS. Also I like the look, been using boost long before it was a Lemmy client.
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
I see no evidence of that: I’m pretty all clients load a web engine and related resources including CSS, which means you’re installing a redundant, special-purpose web client when you already have a general web client installed. Plus, lacking basic functionality as OP states makes it the opposite of useful.
MirrorGiraffe@piefed.social 1 day ago
That’s a wild assumption. Lenmy has a well documented API that wouldn’t pass on frontend-related things.
Making a client scrape the frontend seems like a lot of work for a worse result.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This is an idiotic assertion which makes me feel dumb that I even stopped scrolling for your pointless vitriol.