I do think the EU should start with a more basic app like FluffyChat in testing but rebranded, then try to make their own app over the Matrix protocol that fits their specific communications needs and share that development publicly with open source.
Comment on European Commission Trials Matrix to Replace Microsoft Teams
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day agoMatrix is good. Element is not. It is a terrible application filled with bugs that ends up limiting the quality of other client applications.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Samsy@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
German military uses matrix with their own messenger.
Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
Oh perfect. That would be a good upstream base for other European govt projects.
KiwiTB@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Didn’t XMPP already solve these issues a long time ago?
arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
The biggest problem with XMPP is what various servers and clients implement is kind of all over the place. For instance, most clients support an older version of OMEMO, but some clients support newer versions, and the different versions are incompatible.
The other issue is some platforms (iOS in particular) have pretty shitty XMPP apps filled with bugs.
I still generally like XMPP more than Matrix since ATM Matrix clients are also filled with bugs/laggy, Synapse (the main server implementation) is very resource heavy, and message syncing is kind of shit if the client doesn’t implement sliding sync (like FluffyChat). I personally think the UI for both XMPP and Matrix clients generally kind of suck, which isn’t great for convincing non-techy people to use them.
apftwb@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I personally think the UI for both XMPP and Matrix clients generally kind of suck, which isn’t great for convincing non-techy people to use them.
Ding ding ding. Make a Discord/Slack clone that does screensharing and drag/drop file sharing and I won’t care if it uses XMPP or Matrix
ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
I mean, matrix is similar. So many official features aren’t supported by various clients, and then there are non official features that the clients do support, that aren’t supported by the official clients.
But matrix or XMPP, that problem is easily enough avoided at the “government rollout” level by standardising on a particular client and server combination
ohnomorelemmy@piefed.social 1 day ago
This is a case where federation is nice.
It’s good to have an easy model for communication between members of different trusted organizations without requiring everyone to create a new account on a different server.
Ulrich@feddit.org 1 day ago
XMPP is federated
JonnyRobbie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Any matrix client available for both android and ios with video conference capabilities? … that might have sounded a bit too aggressive. My question is genuine. Family members needs.
nao@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
Have not tried it, but supposedly Element X does support that
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Yeah. Compared to Teams, Matrix is fine. It’s just far from a powerful tool built by people who actually give a shit.
Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Rocket.Chat seems to be doing well in Europe as well; they recently released their own native matrix implementation.
KiwiTB@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’ve heard element, the common server software and even the protocol itself are also simply meh as well … That’s not a great start… And the name alone is a huge problem for adoption
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Element the server suite is fine - it’s just a version of Synapse with rust and Python bindings.
bridgeburner@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Interesting. My company uses Matrix Element as well and it works great.