Comment on CEO of Palantir Says AI Means You’ll Have to Work With Your Hands Like a Peasant

• partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Robot automation has not lowered the quality of a Ford vehicle
  

  I never said that and the quality of a ford truck is irrelevant to the assembly worker who lost their job due to automation.

  You need to back up because you have gone down a tangent alone.

  I agree we’re down a tangent, but I’m following the logic of your responses. Which point to you want to back up to that would change our conversation path?

  The notion that people won’t eat sawdust bread is demonstrably false with many historical examples proving you wrong.

  I’m glad you saw those. I specifically chose sawdust in my example because of those events in history. Those support what I’m talking about. When the adulteration of the food became bad enough, people stopped eating it.

  Your stipulation about zero flour is a moving goalpost and a strawman fyi

  My “zero flour” comment is a response to your original thesis where you said: “quality of service can drop indefinitely.”

  It can’t be indefinitely. There’s a point where people will stop consuming it when it gets bad enough.

  source

  • Canconda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    you said: “quality of service can drop indefinitely.”

    What I actually said was…

    As long as the rich maintain their monopolies quality of service can drop indefinitely.

    So yes you have completely missed my point and are arguing with yourself, not me.

    source

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      I have never intentionally put words in your mouth. The best I can figure after rereading our entire thread is that you’re jumping around on different points but giving no clues in the conversation you’re doing that. As in, I’m responding to one of your points, but you’re providing a rebuttal for a completely different point of your own.

      In this conversation I’ve been trying to restate what I’m seeing as your interpretation in an attempt to confirm we’re communicating, but then I get another response indicating we’re not communicating.

      There’s two possibilities I see as to whats happening here:

      • your thesis and points are not logically consistent

      OR

      • we are simply not able to communicate effectively with one another today

      For the purposes of civility, I’m not going to make a judgment one which one these it is. I’ll let you give your downvote button a rest and simply bow out talking more with you today. Maybe in the future we’ll have better luck with one another.

      source

      • Canconda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Bro all I’m saying is that the trend of enshittification is only going to accelerate in the world of AI.

        and youre like YOUTUBE IS SHIT NOWWWWWWWWWW

        Seriously.

        source
      • Canconda@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Its the second one. I’m downvoting you because you keep omitting half my statements and responding to the resulting altered meaning.

        From what I read you seem more concerned about the quality of youtube videos and ford trucks than the workers who lost their jobs due to automation. I’m not sayings thats what you believe mind you. Just pointing out how different of a page you are on than me.

        source