I think belief in God, the Day of Judgment and Heaven and Hell act as stronger deterrents against immorality than just the (accurate but easier to bend) belief that some things are good and others and bad and you should pursue the first and avoid the latter (which can be believed by a non-religious person in a vacuum, but for the rest of us these limits are defined by God so if our feelings or whims conflict with it it doesn’t really matter cause it wasn’t up to us).
And, also, because I believe God is all the wonderful things he is, I assume he’ll also be soft on his approach, even if the person was yapping wild things online against God and whatnot at some points in their lives. They were just confused, perhaps emotionally compromised, but at the end of the day they tried to do the right thing regularly, and that counts for a lot. That’s the biggest part, in fact.
This was never meant to be a religious post, but thanks for reminding me why I don’t follow, it starts too much shit.
Check my other comment, and can you folks please chill? There’s private messages if you wanna talk about the imaginary dude in the sky.
It’s been a very polite convo but fair enough.
Much love, from a simple down to earth human. We’re all on this planet together, let us all be happy, healthy, and willing to help those in struggle.
I know I’m not a perfect person, but I prefer peace over war…
aMockTie@piefed.world 1 day ago
This is an area where I disagree. I personally think that the “golden rule,” treat others how you want to be treated, is the only foundation of morality that is needed. That can mean different things to different people, so perhaps a more accurate statement would be: “treat others how they want to be treated, because you want the same.”
If someone’s foundation of morality depends on an all powerful authority that can exclusively define what should and should not be punished, I worry about what they might do if they interpret the message of that authority to be harmful to otherwise innocent people.