It’s only superficial though, and completely circumstantial (I was born here so this is my team, or this is my dad’s team, idk). Sure, many people who consider themselves religious also don’t believe in anything actually and just go along with the rites and like to be part of a larger group (whatever the group is or stands for is inconsequential, I guess, just like in sports) because they’re silly people. I just couldn’t, I’m not ignorant enough not to recognise it’s completely shallow and meaningless. Like, what does it mean to be to support different teams when, in the end, we both love football? And again, I have IRL enemies such as Zionists, general imperialists, rapists, etc, because we fundamentally disagree on the basis of morality but when it comes to football how does that apply? You like football, I like football, we both like football, it just so happens that I was born in this city and you were born in yours! We don’t disagree on anything, we just want this team or this other one to win because of whims and habit. But if, for example, the average American experiences and processes belief the same way they do football teams, I guess that explains a lot, lol.
And hi! 🤣
aMockTie@piefed.world 1 day ago
Very true! But the same could also be said of many, if not most religious people. I was born to parents who followed this religion, grew up following this religion, and therefore this is my religion.
What does it mean to believe in different Abrahamic religions if they all believe in the same God? What about polytheists or atheists who follow an identical moral compass without the belief in the same God?
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s the tenets that they choose to value what makes the difference, I guess. Those who don’t even read and just wear a cross and say “Jesus!” every so often, I’m not really sure what they value… but every Paulian doctrine has a clear disconnect between actions and the destiny of your soul (because you don’t merit God’s promise by your acts but it’s all grace and believing Jesus is God or something like that, whatever that means, lol) whilst Islam and Mosaic Judaism don’t (Jesus included, ofc). As much as I dislike saying this out loud because I don’t feel like hurting some good people’s feelings, the reality of things is that Trinitarians are slightly confused manworshippers who follow state Roman doctrines more than Jesus and “the law and the prophets” he followed, so I don’t really consider them as part of the same group. Islam and Judaism (and the OG Jesus followers who called him rabbi and not God are part of both or either, ofc) are actual Abrahamic monotheists. Like a disciple says in the Bible (the author escapes me right now): “you believe in God? Demons do too! Show me your faith without works and I’ll show you my faith through my works!”
aMockTie@piefed.world 1 day ago
Regarding the teachings of Paul, that’s another area where we both agree. I’ve never understood why Christians put so much weight behind the words of a man, even when they contradicted the words of Jesus.
How do you feel about polytheists and atheists that follow the same moral compass, but do not share the same religious beliefs?
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This is absolutely amazing. I said absolutely nothing at all about religious beliefs, but here we are…
This is exactly why I don’t follow religion at all, I prefer science.
Like what the hell, more wars are fought in the name of [insert diety name] than any other cause.
The following of a diety seems to cause more violence than anything else I’ve ever seen in my life, so I choose to not follow an imaginary diety in the sky.
I prefer to just exist and be a constructive, helpful person when I’m needed. Fuckall with all the wars over ‘holy land’ and all that violent jazz…
I never meant for this post to lead to arguments, but here you folks start it anyways.
Shame ☹️
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I think belief in God, the Day of Judgment and Heaven and Hell act as stronger deterrents against immorality than just the (accurate but easier to bend) belief that some things are good and others and bad and you should pursue the first and avoid the latter (which can be believed by a non-religious person in a vacuum, but for the rest of us these limits are defined by God so if our feelings or whims conflict with it it doesn’t really matter cause it wasn’t up to us).
And, also, because I believe God is all the wonderful things he is, I assume he’ll also be soft on his approach, even if the person was yapping wild things online against God and whatnot at some points in their lives. They were just confused, perhaps emotionally compromised, but at the end of the day they tried to do the right thing regularly, and that counts for a lot. That’s the biggest part, in fact.