It wasn’t, it was test data
Comment on NordVPN denies breach claims, says attackers have "dummy data"
Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 days ago
Why would *VPN even have ANY data worth taking through breaching?
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 days ago
You don’t have any “test data” if you don’t have any “real data”. Why would you?
null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 days ago
Same reason as any other online company?
Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 days ago
So for selling it to aggregators? That’s bad practice for a VPN-providing company.
null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 days ago
So for selling it to aggregators?
You really think thats the primary function for user data? Not like, billing?
Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 days ago
Billing? ID -> balance. “Very” important data for hackers. They had more? Like card numbers, names, addresses, etc? That’s a bad practice for VPN providers.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Because your previous trust is clearly misplaced.
I don’t care what somebody’s TOS says, I’m going to remain skeptical.
dublet@lemmy.world 3 days ago
They operate a business that charges for a service, and therefore have user accounts and payment data for those accounts.
john_lemmy@lemmy.ml 3 days ago
There is at least one VPN provider (that I know of) that doesn’t record account and payment data. You can send the fee via regular post in a envelope tied to only a random numerical user ID
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Mulvad. That’s how I do it.