I overall like AI, but it’s not great for making this type of argument because it doesn’t offer anyone anything they can really use to update their beliefs about what’s true. Any of the factual claims there could be hallucinated, and most are only tangentially relevant to the question of how strong the parallels between the attitude towards computers 50 years ago are to attitudes towards AI now. If someone wants to seriously consider the question, it isn’t useful.
A better way to do it is to use it like a search engine to find relevant citeable information and then make your own case for its relevance. Or maybe in this case just some personal anecdotes would work pretty well, you’re claiming personal experience as your main source here and I kind of wanted to hear more about it.
lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
lol way to prove a point
fucking fuck
IWW4@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Are you under the impression that before ai, there were people prepare search responses?
An automated thing got replaced by an automated thing.
lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
Whatever.