Part of the reason it was removed is because he was arrested, and because members of the public asked Apple to remove it. This is the government and private citizens influencing a company to deplatform an absolute cunt. And it’s not a whim, that private company has clear and public guidelines for what is allowed on their platform
Comment on Apple removes app created by Andrew Tate
jet@hackertalks.com 1 year agoThen I look forward to a court, following due process, putting a media gag order on them taking down their web presence.
It shouldn’t be left up to the whims of private organizations, to remove somebody from the public discourse.
GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 1 year ago
jet@hackertalks.com 1 year ago
Agreed. Fully within Apple and Google’s rights to remove any application from their app stores.
This is why I mentioned progressive web apps as a more independent option.
avater@lemmy.world 1 year ago
it’s called rule of the house buddy, if don’t play by the rules you have to fuck off, pretty easy.
would you give hitler a platform?
jet@hackertalks.com 1 year ago
43 minutes to godwining the conversation. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Did you actually read your link?
No, you didn’t read it.
ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Understanding it and having to read the whole Wiki page do not have to go hand in hand; you are misunderstanding jet’s intention, or at the very least you are assuming.
Jet gave an opinion/perspective already and your question was loaded at best, not something which is intended to continue the conversation. Just because Godwin said it should function one way doesn’t actually mean it does. I do not think you are discussing in good faith, and do not see your invoking of “hitler or stalin” is conducive to a quality exchange.
avater@lemmy.world 1 year ago
didn’t answer the question buddy…but pretty impressive how you can use wikipedia, I’ll give you that.
ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Do you understand what Godwin’s Law is? Your “hitler or stalin” question is loaded at best, and makes everything after it pointless, as you are bringing up a hypothetical (and impossibility, since they are dead). Bring up someone living who is not in prison.