Comment on AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output

• atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The number of times I have received an un-proofread two sentence email is too damn high.

  source

  • galaxy_nova@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    And then the follow up email because they didn’t actually finish a complete thought

    source

    • Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I do this with texts/DMs, but I’d never do that with an email. I double or triple check everything, make sure my formatting is good, and that the email itself is complete. I’ll DM someone 4 or 5 times in 30 seconds though, it feels like a completely different medium ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      source
• FauxLiving@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  (Fuck AI though. Planet burning trash)

  It’s humans burning the planet, not the spicy Linear Algebra.

  Blaming AI for burning the planet is like blaming crack for robbing your house.

  source

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Blaming AI is in general criticising everything encompassing it, which includes how bad data centers are for the environment. It’s like also recognizing that the crack the crackhead smoked before robbing your house is also bad.

    source
  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    How about I blame the humans that use and promote AI. The humans that defend it in arguments using stupid analogies to soften the damage it causes?

    Would that make more sense?

    source

    • architect@thelemmy.club ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You’ll never ban it. The most you’ll do is ban it for the poor and working class. Do you understand how bad that would be?

      source
  • kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Blaming AI for burning the planet is like blaming guns for killing children in schools, it’s people we should be banning!

    source