Comment on AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output
Katzelle3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Almost as if it was made to simulate human output but without the ability to scrutinize itself.
Comment on AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output
Katzelle3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Almost as if it was made to simulate human output but without the ability to scrutinize itself.
mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 day ago
To be fair most humans don’t scrutinize themselves either.
atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
The number of times I have received an un-proofread two sentence email is too damn high.
galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And then the follow up email because they didn’t actually finish a complete thought
Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 hours ago
I do this with texts/DMs, but I’d never do that with an email. I double or triple check everything, make sure my formatting is good, and that the email itself is complete. I’ll DM someone 4 or 5 times in 30 seconds though, it feels like a completely different medium ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s humans burning the planet, not the spicy Linear Algebra.
Blaming AI for burning the planet is like blaming crack for robbing your house.
BassTurd@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Blaming AI is in general criticising everything encompassing it, which includes how bad data centers are for the environment. It’s like also recognizing that the crack the crackhead smoked before robbing your house is also bad.
Rhoeri@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
How about I blame the humans that use and promote AI. The humans that defend it in arguments using stupid analogies to soften the damage it causes?
Would that make more sense?
kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 11 hours ago
Blaming AI for burning the planet is like blaming guns for killing children in schools, it’s people we should be banning!