same with qwen, ernie, minimax, and kimi
Comment on Oracle made a $300 billion bet on OpenAI. It's paying the price.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 month agoDeepSeek the software is open source (MIT license).
breadguy@kbin.earth 1 month ago
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It‘s open weights but definitely not
truly open source
Feel free to blame the technology as a whole but open source doesn‘t make exceptions for AI models.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Unless the dataset, weighting, and every aspect is open source, it’s not truly open source, as the OSI defines it.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Bullshit, the dataset is massive, and a dataset may include bias. You would always want to use a dataset that fir your needs.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
no,
your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.
source code is what defines open source.
what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.
Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 month ago
Still debatable, the weights are the code. That’s a bit like saying “X software is not open source because it has equations but it doesn’t include the proofs that they’re derived from”.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 month ago
techwireasia.com/…/china-open-source-ai-models-gl…
I’ve read similar claims in other articles, I have no idea why they would call it open source if it’s not?