same with qwen, ernie, minimax, and kimi
Comment on Oracle made a $300 billion bet on OpenAI. It's paying the price.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 weeks agoDeepSeek the software is open source (MIT license).
breadguy@kbin.earth 3 weeks ago
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It‘s open weights but definitely not
truly open source
Feel free to blame the technology as a whole but open source doesn‘t make exceptions for AI models.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Unless the dataset, weighting, and every aspect is open source, it’s not truly open source, as the OSI defines it.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Bullshit, the dataset is massive, and a dataset may include bias. You would always want to use a dataset that fir your needs.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
no,
your changing the definition of open source software. which has been around a lot longer than AI has.
source code is what defines open source.
what deepseek has is open weights. they publish the results of their learning only. not the source that produced it.
Jrockwar@feddit.uk 3 weeks ago
Still debatable, the weights are the code. That’s a bit like saying “X software is not open source because it has equations but it doesn’t include the proofs that they’re derived from”.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
techwireasia.com/…/china-open-source-ai-models-gl…
I’ve read similar claims in other articles, I have no idea why they would call it open source if it’s not?