Comment on Oracle made a $300 billion bet on OpenAI. It's paying the price.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days agoyour changing the definition of open source software.
techwireasia.com/…/china-open-source-ai-models-gl…
The tide has turned. With the December 2024 launch of DeepSeek’s free-for-all V3 large language model (LLM) and the January 2025 release of DeepSeek’s R1 (the AI reasoning model that rivals the capabilities of OpenAI’s O1), the open-source movement started by Chinese firms has sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
I’ve read similar claims in other articles, I have no idea why they would call it open source if it’s not?
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
can you show me the actual source code?
the human readable code, not the weights.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The (claimed) source:
github.com/deepseek-ai
Investigating further I can see it is NOT open source. All the articles saying that are lying, probably unknowingly just as I believed the claim, they probably did too, and I’m NOT being sarcastic!
I have no idea why publishing these “weights” is considered open source, it has nothing to do with Open Source as defined by OSI, which I believe has a historical right to the term.
I apologize.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
forgive my snarkiness. its usually the quickest way to this realization.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Oh I didn’t detect any snarkiness, just you being to the point, which is a thing I appreciate.
But I’m often considered impolite. I think it’s a culture thing.
But I must admit I am annoyed by you contradicting me, but it’s even worse that you were right.
I find that generally offensive.
So I’ll go sulk in corner for a few minutes. 😜 😋 🤣