It would force you to write a more descriptive name. Maybe we want to hide by community title and not the handle though.
Say you want to have a community for memes. It is terrible UX if you just see seven different “memes@domainname.ending” in the result. So with an opinionated search, you instead name your community Sopuli Memes, Solarpunk Memes, Programming Memes etc., or just Funny Memes Archive, and they would not be hidden.
Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 1 week ago
A lot of the “less active ones” are completely dead. Many mid-tier topics (not niche, but not “meme shitpost”) have a sea of dead communities and 1-2 active ones and it’s difficult to find them without actually clicking through the full list of results.
Skavau@piefed.social 1 week ago
Tbh, and I llan to do this for piefed.social soon (and rimu has given me the go-ahead) - abandoned discarded communities with literally zero posts need to be purged by instances. It’s just clutter.
If a community was active and then isn’t, that’s fine, but a lot of communities are made and then never used.
Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 1 week ago
Cool, but there are other instances.
Then there is the issue of communities with a decent number of subs (much more than active communities) but where the last post was 7 months ago and they have 0 MAUs. While a community with a lot less subs can have several posts per week and at least some MAUs (couple of hundred).
Skavau@piefed.social 1 week ago
Yeah, I know. That’s why I think other instances should also do it lol
Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 week ago
And that’s exactly what the blogpost is trying to solve.
Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 1 week ago
I think this could also be improved with a better search page, which shows how active the communities are in the search results so you don’t have to click through them all, I think v1.0 is getting that