I’m a little disappointed, but not surprised. This thing is designed to be used in the living room hooked up to the TV, after all.
The fact of A/V consumer electronics standardizing on HDMI instead of DisplayPort is kinda not Valve’s problem to solve, as much as I’d like it to try.
Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
the problem is although its a pc, valve wants it to sort of appeal to console users. and the problem is that the HDMI forum members are also TV manufacturers. they are very unlikely to ever support displayport.
as long as TVs are more popular than monitors, that trend of HDMI holding control will never cease.
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
Except there is no reason to ever put hdmi on the hardware. Displayport is superior to hdmi in every way, and when you need to step down to peasant land… a simple passive DP to hdmi cable/adapter will do the job.
Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
there is, HDMI Arc, which is why all the home theater companies do not want to weaken its hold.
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
There is no technical reason DP doesnt have ARC. Its more of the industry is strangled by the HDMI forum. So you’ll never find an AV receiver with DP… thus no reasons for vesa to waste bandwidth for a feature that the industry will never adopt.
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
I think the reason you mention is a pretty good one… who wants to solely rely on adapters?
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
They can just bundle them? What is the issue here?
lengau@midwest.social 1 day ago
I’m still upset at how hard it is to get a monitor with multiple DP inputs…