I don’t think it’s the best user experience when you get a new product neither do I think they are foolproof.
Comment on Why won’t Steam Machine support HDMI 2.1? Digging in on the display standard drama.
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 days agoThey can just bundle them? What is the issue here?
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I mean… if someone can’t figure out which end goes where. Theres gonna struggle with a standard hdmi cable. I guess they could custom print big text on the cable ends to make it clear which end goes where. They’ll certainly have the volume to make such customization.
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
I think it’s more of the hassle side of things, added complexity (even if small) and it makes the product feel less refined/premium/sleek in my opinion (not something I care about personally, but the masses do and it adds some friction, even if little).
I may be wrong, maybe adapters have no issue with hdmi to DP, but in the past I have only heard of trouble with adapters just not working for some devices.
piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 days ago
Dp to hdmi is very reliable. The siginals are near identical, the adapter is just a level shifter. Not much can go wrong. Issues arise when talking about either cheaply made (out of spec) or active adapters.
it makes the product feel less refined/premium/sleek in my opinion
Maybe for Apple users.
ramble81@lemmy.zip 3 days ago
Except it’s not. HDMI licensing (for high volume) is a $10,000 flat fee, plus $0.04 per unit if you use HDCP. So if you were to sell 100,000 units that would be $14,000 ($10K base plus $0.04 x 100K).
Based on those numbers you would have to find a way to include a physical adapter for $0.14/unit. I don’t think you’re gonna find anything that cheap with any amount of quality.