They could have made it peer to peer somehow but are charging just for being a middle man, which is kind of the definition of enshittification
Comment on The Enshittification of Plex Is Kicking Off, Starting with Free Roku Users
Kirk@startrek.website 1 day ago
I’m a Jellyfin guy, but charging money for a product or service isn’t what “enshittification” means. As the article says this is just removing a loophole for legacy apps on older devices. The pricing model hasn’t changed.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 day ago
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 day ago
It is paid productivity software. Use Jelyfin if you want a free OSS media server.
Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Nothing I said indicated I use it. I was correcting OP for saying this isn’t enshittification.
damnedfurry@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Doesn’t enshittification also entail the removal/reduction of previously-existing features/functionality?
SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
Enshitification is the specific process of capturing a supplier/consumer market through short term subsidies, squeezing out the competition, and then squeezing the suppliers and consumers directly.
Increasing prices alone isn’t enshitification. But increasing prices after sustaining artificially low prices for the purpose of creating a monopoly or quasi monopoly is enshitification.
Plex most definitely was providing a good quality product but was not generating revenue, and has little to no competition (Jellyfin is a bit debatable) as a result. Was it intentional or just incompetence? Hard to prove either way. I’d say the biggest argument against enshitification is that Plex is mostly a product instead of market space hosting suppliers and consumers, like Google, YouTube, AirBNB, Uber, etc.