Welfare? For billion dollar companies? That’s rich.
Comment on Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service
rhubarb@lemmy.world 1 day agoIt’s not socialism, it’s welfare.
pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
rhubarb@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
There’s a ton of precedent. Welfare for the rich is justified all the time while those who truly need it are see less and less
_stranger_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
only if you consider companies as people.
rhubarb@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
I’m not agreeing with it but if it were socialism we would at least have public ownership of the bailed out company. Any bailout would just be corporate welfare with little return
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 20 hours ago
The bailout should transfer ownership to the public. Employees and (sane) products/services can stay, the idiots who tanked the company can shuffle off.
Zorque@lemmy.world 1 day ago
That’s the same with socialism, though.
_stranger_@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Socialism would do what’s best for society.
Zorque@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it’s not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It’s merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs.