They just said they wish they could have an iPhone, and that it was jailbroken. Implying a power user who knows what they want (an iPhone) and how to use it. And this response wouldn’t have been appropriate for almost any context, but in this one it’s particularly nonsensical.
watson@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
That is not what they said
If you have to lie in order to make your point, then you have lost the argument already
brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 minutes ago
That’s exactly what I said, and meant: I miss my jailbroken iPhone; I wish I could jailbreak mine now. But I can’t. And my 6 would be basically unusable without App Store support now.
That’s not why I’m replying though… I’m curious; what’s with insults like “eat me” over interpretations of someone else’s comment?
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Yeah, ok. Last I checked, telling someone they didn’t read correctly wasn’t an argument. And you didn’t read correctly. At all. Or maybe it’s you who is lying? That would be explained by this comment being pure projection.
watson@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
No, but all of the false claims you made certainly count as a lie.
And since you’re obviously quite skilled at selective omission, pick the part of this next phrase you like the most: eat me
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
lol, couldn’t be prouder to not be in that cult with the likes of people like you.