Comment on Expecting a LLM to become conscious, is like expecting a painting to become alive

finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  That kind of painting seems more likely to come alive

  source
• forrgott@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  New fear unlocked!

  … What the hell, man?!

  ಥ_ಥ

  source

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bro have you never seen a Scooby Doo episode? This can’t be a new concept for you…

    source

    • forrgott@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Ok. Put an LLM into a Scooby Doo episode. Then get back to me…

      source
• LiveLM@lemmy.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  …new SCP?

  source

  • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I tried to submit an SCP once but theres a "review process" and it boils down to only getting in by knowing somebody who is in.

    source
  • peopleproblems@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Agents have debated that the new phenomenon may or may not constitute a new designation. While some have reported the painting following them, the same agents will then later report nothing seems to occur. The agents who report a higher frequency of the painting following them also report a higher frequency of unexplained injury. The injuries can be attributed to cases of self harm, leading scientists to believe these SCP agents were predisposed to mental illness that was not caught during new agent screening.

    source
• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  And that has between seleven and 14+e^πi^ fingers

  source
• lauha@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Well, human intelligence isn’t much better to be honest.

  source

  • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    It clearly demonstrably is. Thats the problem, people are estimating AI to be approximate of Humans but its so so so much worse in every way.

    source

    • lauha@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You are comparing AI to a person who wrote a dictionary i.e. a domain experts. Take an average person from a street and they’ll write the same slop as current AIs

      source

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        But you wouldn’t hire a random person from a street to write the dictionary. You wouldn’t hire a nonspecialist to do anything. If you did, you could at least expect a human to learn and grow, or have a bare minimum standard for ethics, morals, or responsibility. You could at least expect a person to be capable of learning or growing. You cannot expect that from an AI.

        AI have no use case.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      I mean if Ai is right 80%, it’s still more than my idiot brother (roughly 30% by my count)

      source

      • finitebanjo@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        The AI was trained on you and your idiot brother.

        source