They’re still not
I’m honestly amazed they’re worth anything at all.
mrgoodc4t@lemmy.world 1 year ago
negativeyoda@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’d pay $10 to clown on some tech bro if I cared enough. $10 doesn’t even buy you a sandwich these days
AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 1 year ago
It’s just a “Save picture as…” with extra steps, and money!
merc@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Things only have a price when two people are willing to do the transaction.
Say 99% of NFT owners have given up and mentally written off their NFTs as a complete loss. If the remaining 1% are selling at a 90% loss and some sucker is still buying at that 90% discount, the “average price” will be whatever those two agree on.
This is a bit different from physical goods because those can’t just be deleted out of existence. If someone had a warehouse of beanie babies they might choose to give them away (setting the price at zero) or maybe there’s some tiny value of the cloth so they sell them for a few cents per kg.
jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
We have been attributing a huge value to a metal that’s mostly remarkable for being yellow and shinny for millennia, one of the biggest investment bubbles in history was over a flower, and people thought that using a loophole to profit from the arbitrage of international reply coupons was going to last forever. Hell, people paid for fake property titles for land on the Moon and Mars. It’s not that surprising that some people think that buying a random number in a distributed database is an investment.
eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yellow, shiny, and untarnishable/non-poisonous. The latter are very nice properties to have for jewelry, as your skin will eat away most metals over time.
People like looking pretty, that has consistent value other than using it as a medium of exchange/ store of value.
Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Don’t forget the beanie babies, which just like NFTs were created to be scarce and be seen as an investment.
Turned out the same as well.
kambusha@feddit.ch 1 year ago
I didn’t get the “arbitrage of international reply coupons” reference. What’s that one?
jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
That’s what Ponzi told people he was doing. And in the beginning he was, and it was working, but then he started paying investors with other investors money.
AffineConnection@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I might be wrong, but to my recollection, he never got it to work; in the beginning, he merely believed that he could eventually get it to work, and that the first fraudulent payouts to early investors were originally intended as a temporary way of buying time without losing investors.
who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The OG ponzi
UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yeah, the really smart people bought whole stars!
bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 year ago
True, but to be fair, them shiny metals for the longest time were reasonably rare and couldn’t be made, and served well for a means of currency. NFTs are pretty ridiculous all things considered. People also “bought” stars too, so yeah, many will buy dumb shit.
merc@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Yes, but also very rare, and effectively impossible to create or destroy.