Better ensure perfect women/men equality before doing that, otherwise it leads to a big gender disbalance and high infanticide rate for girls, as was demonstrated in China.
Comment on The British Empire
And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 days agoOr just limit1 baby per couple, same effect. Population halves every life cycle
angrystego@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
And009@lemmynsfw.com 18 hours ago
Absolutely, that’s a bigger fight altogether
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 days ago
if memory serves, last time that was attempted it did not work.
And009@lemmynsfw.com 2 days ago
See China
finitebanjo@piefed.world 1 day ago
They were probably referring to that, yes. But most of the issue with China was the additional requirement that only men could inherit the family wealth and title so it led to the killing of female babies and skewing of gender ratios.
They sorted a lot of that out lately and its done wonders for their quality of life long term, but they also renegged on thw whole
And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 day ago
The law had plot holes, just needs to be long sighted with human behavior in mind.
What’s happening now is different story. Maybe it’ll come full circle.
arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Carrot vs stick.
Just give incentives to voluntarily have less kids. Heck, even just education, high wages, and social mobility (particularly for women) typically drops the birth rate at or under 1 child anyway.