That’s my take too - he is doing everything to try not to spook the horses. My concern is, he might stick to this after the election when he’ll have such a stonking majority he could do what he likes.
Comment on Keir Starmer set to reject EU overtures to join revamped bloc as 'non-starter'
Tatters@feddit.uk 1 year agoIt is tricky. My assumption was the opposite, that this would help Labour win the next election, which is why Starmer is doing it. But what do I know?
Emperor@feddit.uk 1 year ago
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 year ago
I think you’re right on this one. Certain press outlets are already painting this as a “plot to reverse brexit”.
Emperor@feddit.uk 1 year ago
He basically can’t say anything without the Tory press jumping on it and spinning it as some kind of secret foreigner-loving, commie plot.
I imagine his chat with Macron was pretty much: “I am highly restricted in what I can say at the moment but we’ll have a longer chat when I win. Nudge, nudge wink, wink.” Macron: “you English with you nudging and winking!”.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 year ago
He wants those sweet sweet red wall Labour voters.
Maybe it’s time to create a new party? There’s probably enough people for a new party to win power based on closer (or rejoin) links with the EU. If only people could get over their (essentially) football team view of UK politics - go on you reds fuck the blues the referee (Bercow) is a wanker etc etc.
MarkHughes4096@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t the lib dems have rejoining or closer ties as part of their manifesto ? or did I not recall properly…
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Yeah but apparently we can’t forgive them for tuition fees. Absolutely barmy but that’s UK politics 🤷. Let’s just keep voting Tory and Labour until we all die.
No but seriously, we need PR and then we need a coalition to support closer meaningful ties to the single market (or choose your variation of that). However the two biggest blockers to PR are Labour and the Tories which we keep voting for because of some tribal allegiance that (for most) started 40 years ago in the eighties… when they weren’t even born!
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Silinde@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Voting for a party that will get into bed with the Tories at the first sign of power coming their way, a party that has repeatedly said they will not do a deal with Labour, is a vote for another Tory hegemony.
Lib Dems had one chance to show they wouldn’t sell out and they cheated their core demographic that got them power. They don’t deserve a second chance.
waz@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Started because of the 70s Three day working week to manage the rolling power cuts, miners strikes fuel crisis, then tortured by thatcher who was set to nuke the unions of the face of the planet. Blues hate working class, reds hate anyone who makes profits, and each are scared the other will do those 70s and 80s things again and again. Nevermind that Blair’s Labour was a middle right party, and nothing like the Red Ken memories of Labour past, and it seems like tories have moved out to the right while Labour have moved into their old chairs. I don’t know what SDP liberals stand for
Hogger85b@kbin.social 1 year ago
Create a new party??? Splitting the left even more is guaranteed Tory rule.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Create a new party that will appeal to voters that want more integration with the EU. That might actually attract some Conservatives that can’t get behind radical left ideals but wanted to stay in the EU. It’s only the ERG nutters that will be left behind.
Basically split both Labour Brexitiers and Tory Brexitiers into their own thing. Both of them are so hard line that they will never cooperate. What’s left will be EU enthusiasts that might, just might, pull together for closer integration / rejoin. And hopefully this new party will have a majority.
But of course if it’s more tribal red and blue that people want then bring on more Brexit! 🥹