The main difference is that Safebox is software that runs on any operating system with a single command using docker. There’s no need to use terminals and commands later on. Like Yunohost, you can install and manage self-hosted apps with it, but it also includes geo-redundant backup and remote access features, all in one interface.
Comment on Safebox: Open-source framework for managing self-hosted apps (Beta)
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
In which way does it differ from Yunohost?
drebora@lemmy.world 1 month ago
sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 month ago
They will have a paid tier after beta
MoonRaven@feddit.nl 1 month ago
€10 a month even though you’re hosting things yourself on your own hardware.
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 month ago
To be fair, the pro plan is for the non-local stuff, which is at least understandable as domains and resolution services are non-free.
Also ongoing development takes resources. Seems like a reasonable approach.
ZeldaFreak@lemmy.world 1 month ago
They should clarify it. If these 3 points are just offering an easier way to do it, then fine. If they block these features in general when you want to manage it yourself, then screw it. I had one self hosted software, which blocked remote access even when you use your own reverse proxy. At least it was a one time payment.
polymachine@feddit.org 1 month ago
From their FAQ:
drebora@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Thanks! That’s a mistake, the pro version is currently completely free in beta.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Yep, two reasons I’m out.
philpo@feddit.org 1 month ago
Just like Cloudron.