Comment on She is making a GREAT point

• Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  This sounds like it would make sense on the surface, but is just not true. You can look up pretty easily that there wasn’t really any research on the viability of male hormonal birth control until half a century after female hormonal birth control became a thing, so it’s not like they made a rational decision based on scientific findings. When they found out how to do it for men, it was roughly comparably complicated, with similar side effects. This too is easy to look up.

  It makes sense that the side effects were too much to legalize hormonal male birth control because today’s standards are much higher. Which is a good thing ofc- im glad they don’t allow new medication as easily as they did in the past. Female birth control wouldn’t be legalized if it was invented today, and neither would, for example, aspirin. They get to stay around because they don’t take that stuff back out usually, even if it wouldn’t pass modern standards. That’s a bit of a tangent though.

  source

  • Scirocco@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Many men would LOVE a reliable, non-condom, male-controlled birth control method

    Currently for men there are two options — condoms, which are problematic and difficult in several ways, or vasectomy, which is essentially permanent or at least difficult and uncertain to be reversed.

    The third method is to take WAY too many TOO HOT baths, but that also has uncertainty and is a real hassle.

    As it stands, really for men they either need to use a condom, or trust that your female partner is reliable.

    source

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      100% agree. The fact that they’re only researching it now has been hurting everyone involved.

      source