Isn’t 2k and 1080P basically the same thing?
Comment on Study Claims 4K/8K TVs Aren't Much Better Than HD To Your Eyes
pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 hours ago
Personal anecdote, moving from 1080p to 2k for my computer monitor is very noticeable for games
olympicyes@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 hours ago
1920x1080 vs 2560x1440
Not crazy higher but a noticeable increase
Noja@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
It’s not 2k, it’s 2.5k
stefenauris@pawb.social 20 hours ago
2k is about double of 1080p and 4k is double of 2k
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
If 4k is 4k because the horizontal resolution is around 4000, so you’d think 1080p, with its 1920p-long lines would be 2k. It’s fucked that it isn’t.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
It’s all just marketing speak at this point.
_g_be@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
“4k” is supposed to be a term for cinema widescreen resolution, but got taken over because it’s short and marketable because “4k is 4x as many pixels as 1080p”
What makes it worse is that then 1440p becomes 2k because “it’s 2x as many pixels”
The flip flop irks me
Noja@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
1080p is 2k, the commenters above are just wrong.
rmuk@feddit.uk 20 hours ago
Yeah. They went from counting pixels by rows to columns. A 16:9 widescreen 1080 display is 1920×1080, and most manufacturers are happy to call 1920 “2K”.
pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 hours ago
Ah yes, my 1920x1080 monitor with a resolution of 2560x1440
Jarix@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Going down from 24" 2048x1152 to 27" 1920x1080 was an extremely noticeably change. Good god I loved that monitor things looked so crisp on it.
nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 hours ago
Even 4K is noticeable for monitors (but probably not much beyond that), but this is referring to TVs that you’re watching from across the couch.