I feel like you’re missing the point.
They’re not saying to jail computers, they’re saying be ware of political leaders using computers to abdicate responsibility.
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
We don’t jail the gun for murder.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
snooggums@piefed.world 5 months ago
We also don't give the murderer a free pass because they used a gun.
A tool is a tool, and the person who designed it or used it is responsible depending on why it caused a negative outcome.
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
[deleted]snooggums@piefed.world 5 months ago
No, I agreed with you in a slightly different way.
Great reading comprehension.
over_clox@lemmy.world 5 months ago
The gun isn’t running software in the background when humans are away either. See my other comment, when shit goes sideways, blame the programmers, engineers, and now the CEOs that decided to jam screwy AI up our collective asses…
mogranja@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Blame the programmers? Yeah, no. The software is owned by the company, blame them.
over_clox@lemmy.world 5 months ago
- Google is built on Android
- Android is built on Linux
- Linux is open source
So, I think that the open source developers should file a class action lawsuit for stealing their code.
Go ahead, ask Linus Torvalds, I bet he’s not exactly happy with the current trajectory…
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
We don’t jail gun manufacturers either.
When a tool is used to kill a human, the user of the tool is guilty.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
When a human dies because a tool was designed with needless danger, the manufacturer is often prosecuted.
But again, I think you’re missing the point.
skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 months ago
We don’t jail gun manufacturers either.
Be a lot cooler if you did
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
When guns have no legal uses, this is a direction we should go. Until then, this holds people accountable for other people misusing their product.
atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 months ago
So when a kid commits suicide because the Generative AI LLM agreed with him in a harmful way?
QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 5 months ago
If a child shot themself, I’d blame the parents.
Keep 'em coming. I can do this all day.
kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 months ago
We shut down companies for it though, and what AI vendors are doing is basically selling the ability to turn job roles into “accountability sinks”, where your true value is in taking the fall for AI when it gets it wrong (…enough that someone successfully sues).
If you want to put it in gun terms: The AI vendors are selling a gun that automatically shoots at some targets but not others. The targets it recommends are almost always profitable in the short term, but not always legal. You must hire a person to sit next to the gun and stop it from shooting illegal targets. It can shoot 1000 targets per minute.
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 months ago
Sounds like a fun job if the acceptable failure rate is like, 50%