Comment on ANTI PEE PAINT

• PunnyName@lemmy.world ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Not nearly enough, especially near the transit.

  source

  • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    “The transit”? There is transit all over Hamburg and there are three directly outside the Hauptbahnhof.

    source
• nixus@anarchist.nexus ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  If people are still peeing in the street there, then it’s not enough.

  source

  • MBech@feddit.dk ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I don’t understand how hard that is to understand for some people.

    I have never met someone who’d rather piss in the streets than in a toilet if given the choice. The answer is always, always, ALWAYS “not enough free, clean, accessible toilets”

    source

    • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The answer is drunk people.

      I was once walking home with a drunk housemate who pissed in the street a few minutes away from home. Also “clean” does not enter into it. The street is not clean.

      source

      • RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        A few minutes can make a difference in wet vs dry pants, especially when there’s 15 beers inside you.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Iambus@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You haven’t met enough drunk people.

      source
  • Iambus@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Stop making excuses. If people are still peeing on the streets they are lazy drunken degenerates.

    source

    • Quill7513@slrpnk.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      i’ve seen more studies saying the answer is more free toilets that i’ve seen everyone is just lazy degenerates. in fact. i haven’t seen any studies that concluded everyone is just lazy degenerates. maybe i’m reading the wrong studies?

      source
  • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    So to you it is axiomatic that the problem is insufficient toilets. You cannot understand that there are people - usually drunk - who will not use a toilet unless they are already inside it. It is not feasible to blanket a city in toilets sufficiently to eliminate public urination, so maybe a multi-pronged approach including discouraging people from doing so is more sensible.

    source

    • nixus@anarchist.nexus ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      We’ve already been doing the later. And how has that been working out?

      You are correct, that I cannot understand something that I’ve never seen, or even heard of. I’ve seen shitfaced people stumble into restrooms pretty frequently. I’ve never seen someone say “I know there is a toilet less than a block from here, but I’d rather piss on the wall!”. But I hear the opposite all the time: “Man, I wish I didn’t have to piss out here, but the nearest toilet is a mile away”.

      It is not feasible to blanket a city in toilets sufficiently to eliminate public urination…

      Citation needed.

      source

      • FishFace@piefed.social ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I have been walking home with someone who pissed in the street less than a block (I don’t live in the US, we don’t have blocks, but it was a couple of minutes) away from home.

        Cmon, use that imagination of yours to go beyond what you have directly experienced.

        Remember too that all drunk people have come from somewhere with a working toilet, because places that serve alcohol have toilets.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• kaki@sh.itjust.works ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Most of these are not free, according to your second link.

  source