imagine how much easier it would be if the world weren’t flat
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
Statick@programming.dev 2 months ago
It would be so much easier if there world was inside out. Then we could just drop the pears to each country.
naticus@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Oh fuck, Drop Pears now too?
HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
I need this laugh today, thank you.
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 months ago
That only helps if you forget Africa exists
Tetragrade@leminal.space 2 months ago
Dumbass shipping route, just tunnel through.
victorz@lemmy.world 2 months ago
This is of course drawing lines on a projected globe, rather than straight lines on a round globe. But the reality is not much better—Argentina is almost exactly on the other side of the planet from Thailand. 🫣 Thailand’s antipode is just off the coast of Peru, so very close to Argentina.
Really, really irresponsible use of resources. Especially if these pears are shipped by sea. Then it’s even worse.
BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Shipping via sea is the cheapest and least greenhouse gas producing way to ship things. With the only exception being pipes, which are significantly better than ships on both fronts. However, we shouldn’t be shipping peaches via pipe. ;p
Nutteman@lemmy.world 2 months ago
We absolutely should so I can put the end of that pipe in my mouth
uninvitedguest@piefed.ca 2 months ago
Image
Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
You have died of dysentery.
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 months ago
Transoceanic pipe cargo lines could be nice. Vacuuming cargo out, pushing in. Like trains, except with no life support concerns.
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Someone is dropping pennies in the vacuum tubes again! Now the whole thing is jammed and we’ve got cargo backed up all the way to Guam!!
And yes Bob, we all know it was you!
victorz@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Ah yeah, I failed to consider that, but it’s at least an even longer route by sea. 😅
Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Longer than what? By plane?
Not not but much…
Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world 2 months ago
AFAIK all ships still run on fuel. Esecially the huge ones.
While a lot of emmissions are “hidden” in the infrastructure, ships still have infrastructure: the ports and terminals weren’t always there like the sea. Less infrastructures than other modes to be sure, but certainly not “free”.
balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 months ago
Well there’s a clear thing you need to do now: go figure out the proportion of greenhouse gasses for a given shipped item caused by shipping. Someone has done the research, seems like you ought to find it.
grue@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The fact that the result can apparently still manage to show up in a store cheaper than peaches grown and packed locally just goes to show how fucked up the economics in Argentina and Thailand are.
FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The economy of the entire globe is designed to siphon money into the West. Third world nations largely aren’t responsible for the failures of their economies, it’s mostly because the West is doing imperialism.
verdi@feddit.org 2 months ago
Good luck trying to convince people in the West to downgrade their lifestyle. Talk about not flying to some remote off the coast of Africa or Asia and you’re looked at like a fucking heathen. Revolution cannot come soon enough.
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
For whatever reason, this method was deemed cheaper. Resources cost money, and you can count on business not blowing money for giggles. You never know what weird shit goes on behind the scenes in a trade you’re not familiar with.
Hard to imagine a case for this one though! I fear there may be government fuckery like tariffs involved.