As with a lot of corporate thinking, someone is tasked to justify the idea after the fact. Its not that they are unclever but that they think backwards. Conclusion first, support later.
Zacryon@feddit.org 1 day ago
The logic behind the voice controls sounds pretty questionable, but it’s supposedly backed by data showing that users spend billions of minutes talking in Microsoft Team meetings, according to Mehdi — so they’re already used to talking on the computer, right?
Do they really reason like this? Oh my. That’s stupid. And here I was thinking Microsoft employs clever people.
M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 day ago
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 day ago
And during those billions of minutes, most of them are cursing the existence of the spyware experience that is teams.
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 day ago
As a programmer, I’ve had numerous colleagues who have ended up as software engineers at MS. They were mostly either unbelievably lazy or extremely incompetent. The rest who were both ended up there as managers.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Microsoft’s technology specialist are top notch regarding their own product. The other 90% are sales(wo)men and their managers.
sigezayaq@startrek.website 1 day ago
ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 1 day ago
TBF this was all more than 5 years ago when the job interviewing process at most IT companies involved just putting a moistened finger underneath the candidate’s nostrils. Apparently the programmer job market is pretty horrific these days, although I wouldn’t know since I drive a school bus now.