I’m a vegan and I barely know about all this stuff. I love all the tips everyone’s sharing here though!
Comment on i enjoy high fructose corn syrup too
v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 21 hours ago
Non-vegans when you let them know there’s more you can eat outside meat and dairy products
Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 20 hours ago
I can’t say I know anyone that loves on an entirely meat and dairy diet.
Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 hours ago
up-yours-woke-moralists
vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
Even I eat potatoes sometimes.
DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
That sounds like a malnourished human
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 hours ago
I tried it for a couple of months. I felt great on it, but it got really fucking boring
Ephera@lemmy.ml 9 hours ago
I’ve heard before that people feel good on a carnivore diet at first, but then it flips into the negative pretty quickly as your body runs out of vitamins.
Wikipedia lists even more drastic long-term problems: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore_diet#Health_conce…
ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
You won’t go low on vitamins if your carnivore diet incorporates organ meat. Most people don’t want to do this however. Liver isn’t terribly popular, kidneys and other organs even less so.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
This is completely ignoring that there’s multiple varieties of LDL cholesterol, some of which are benign. And basic blood draws don’t differentiate them, you need more detailed blood tests.
Dietary fiber is not an essential nutrient. Not only that, when I went carnivore for 2 months, after the first week of acclimation I was more regular than I have ever been in my life.
The study referenced is an epidiological study based on surveys of people that were asked to recall what they’ve eaten for the past 30 years. This resulted in clearly erroneous data where average daily calory intake was wildly off from average human requirements.
And you’re not supposed to draw conclusions from epidemiological studies with results lower than a 100% risk increase (aka doubling risk). The result of this study was 18%.
At best, this study should have been used to propose a more focussed double-blind study on the subject. But they didn’t. The WHO should be ashamed for platforming this trash study as if it’s 6-sigma physics results
The amount of protein that you’d need to eat to make this a problem is far beyond what a normal human could eat in a day. You’d die from rabbit starvation before it’d get that far. This study is like the one rat study claiming that asperthame causes cancer, but they were giving the rats 1000x the dose a normal human would consume if you corrected for body weight.