We’ll just set up another retrospective meeting and have a lessons learned.
Then we won’t change anything based off the findings of the retro and lessons learned.
Comment on [deleted]
dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 months ago“Apparently there’s never the money to do it right, but somehow there’s always the money to do it twice.”
Management never likes to have this brought to their attention, especially in a Told You So tone of voice. One thinks if this bothered pointy-haired types so much, maybe they could learn from their mistakes once in a while.
ozymandias117@lemmy.world 5 months ago
PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Post-mortems always seemed like a waste of time to me, because nobody ever went back and read that particular confluence page (especially me executives who made the same mistake again)
shalafi@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Post mortems are for, “Remember when we saw something similar before? What happened and how did we handle it?”
monsieur_hackerman@programming.dev 5 months ago
They should also include the recommended steps to take to prevent the issue again, which would allow you to investigate why the changes you made (you were allowed to make the changes, right? Manglement let you make the changes?) didn’t prevent the issue
tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Twice? Shiiiii
PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Amateur numbers, lol