The first part of your comment is contradicting the last part of it.
Comment on Fear not, and enjoy this mere interlude to its fullest!
Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Nothingless void is as believable as afterlife. From scientific point of view neither make sense, it’s like we’re giving ourseleves some metaphysical distinctiveness from the rest of universe but are merely physical bodies according to our scientific knowledge. And according to that we precisely know what’s after death: we rot in grave, and that’s sit. But that answer is not satisfying for us, because of our consciousness.
uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 1 day ago
Nothingness void is just another phrase for "irreversible loss of consciousness. Which is orders of magnitudes more believable than afterlife.
Matriks404@lemmy.world 1 day ago
But why call it void if there’s no void at all? Or nothingness. There’s only void and nothingness when universe ends (if that theory is true of course). People still think about it as a state of our consciousness, when there is no really any ‘state’ after we die. It’s like
NULLvsUNDEFINEDin programming, or at least I see this that way.dubyakay@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
The universe ending is not actually fact. It’s just a theory.