You are connecting things that aren’t connected, consolidating very different examples into one and same, but that’s neither helpful or productive. Oversimplifying to the point of confusing the very premise is making your point seem like nonsense, even if you have a trace of a valid point in there.
Responsibility does not work like you present it. Nor does freedom. There are different types of responsibility, and different types of freedom, with a scale for each, not a binary option.
Some of those responsibilities do go hand in hand with your proposed contrasting freedom, but not all. And all of that to a very much varying degree.
So when you ultimately connect it all to socialism, it just comes off as lazy critique against socialism, instead of a point about responsibilities vs. freedoms. Which just makes the entire thing moot, and finally explains the dissonance with the examples given.
Not a great contribution in my opinion. Just explaining my downvote as a general gesture of goodwill.
angrystego@lemmy.world 1 week ago
That’s not what socialism is about though. It’s about being responsible not just for yourself, but for the society you live in as well. Being all about yourself is nice, but you need other people, you need a functional society around. The responsible and intelligent thing to do is to support the society you live in, to pool finance to be able to afford things you (or most other people) wouldn’t be able to afford. Social solidarity is another level of responsibility.