I’m not defending or particularly interested in the outage. If their service is unsatisfactory, leave them. That’s business and they probably deserve it.
What I find amazing is that they’re being held to a standard that no other private business is held to. I see no fundamental difference between this company offering a service and any other.
Forget tech, compare them to Macca’s. Imagine a service outage that meant Macca’s couldn’t sell you burgers today. You’d shrug and take your business elsewhere.
Optus is getting brought before the government for a “Please explain” and a $12 Million fine. Yes, they own infrastructure. That’s my point. It’s theirs. They can in theory decide to just stop offering their product tomorrow.
Somehow we have reached a point where enough people totally rely on their service that they face this level of scrutiny when they stuff up.
Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 6 months ago
Kinda yeah but nah, I see this with apps like Duolingo where people bitch endlessly about it, I’m like if you hate it so much just go use another app :| why are you rewarding them with your subscription money if you hate it so much?
But Telcos are regulated by these guys:
en.wikipedia.org/…/Australian_Communications_and_…
We recently had this requirement (thanks to Optus 🫥) handed to us all:
acma.gov.au/rules-significant-and-major-outages
If we want to make sure we don’t get fined we all agree to implement this rule (despite being a pain in the ass) and all the other rules they set for us
the equivalent would be regulations that Maccas have to agree to in order to sell burgers, so I assume it would be something like food safety standards? www.health.gov.au/…/food-standards-and-safety
So if Maccas screw up and violate one of these standards then they fined and if it was a big enough issue where multiple people died I assume they’d be dragged before the government for a please explain and maybe even shut down until the issue was fixed