And it fixes nothing. Who is going to buy an already less powerful chip now half powered by Intel.
Comment on Intel says Arc GPUs will live on after Nvidia deal
probable_possum@leminal.space 23 hours ago
What?
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang confirmed today that Nvidia will contribute “GPU chiplets” that Intel can place alongside its x86 CPU cores instead of the Arc integrated graphics it develops in-house today.
They could buy AMD Radeon chiplets too, that would be something.:)
CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Thorry@feddit.org 22 hours ago
Intel actually bought AMD Radeon GPUs for their Hades Canyon (Kaby Lake G) platform. It was a NUC mainboard with a full Intel platform, combined with an AMD Radeon GPUs. The Intel CPU and the GPU (including HBM2 memory for the GPU) was all on one package.
I think they did a couple of follow ups on that as well, because it worked very well.
probable_possum@leminal.space 20 hours ago
Interesting. What a strange companionship. :)
sorghum@sh.itjust.works 18 hours ago
There was a time she you could have a platform that ran with components from all 3. Intel CPU, AMD GPU, and nvidia’s nForce chipset on the mobo.
AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
AMD’s GPUs were much faster than Intel’s, and making GPUs for this kind of application was something AMD already did. Nvidia didn’t, so would have to design a whole chip from scratch, and didn’t really have a power efficiency advantage (in recent generations where AMD’s desktop cards have run hot, it’s because they’ve been clocked high to keep up with Nvidia’s cards, but the same architecture runs cool when clocked lower for mobile applications, e.g. Vega was notoriously inefficient on the desktop due to being delayed two years and having to compete with a different generation than it was designed to, but was great in laptop APUs). Intel would also have gained experience with chiplets and packaging a fast GPU with a CPU. It let everyone involved make more money than doing it any other way.