Comment on User "threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works" is banning users for downvoting his posts.
SorteKanin@feddit.dk 22 hours agoYou are intended to moderate via votes. But I hope you don’t feel that something you disagree with needs to be “moderated”. Other people are allowed to disagree with you, it doesn’t require moderation.
FridaySteve@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Right that’s what I’m saying, I don’t understand why voting buttons are there except for users to use them to moderate each other. I don’t feel like they’re necessary at all. I participated in online discussions for 25 years before reddit showed up. We didn’t need voting buttons at all and the presence of those buttons removes nuance and complexity from the conversation.
Skavau@piefed.social 19 hours ago
They're there so the frontpage isn't a disordered mess where nonsense posts aren't given equal weight to meaningful news stories.
FridaySteve@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
You can do this by displaying the threads in the order they were last bumped and pruning / deleting them by the last time they were bumped (age) or thread limit per board, in other words, based on participation. …you don’t need voting buttons.
SorteKanin@feddit.dk 16 hours ago
This does not work at all. There are many threads being participated in all the time on all kinds of communities. If we did it this way, we would get a new set of posts on the front page every time you refresh, simply because 20 comments had been posted in 20 threads that just happen to be the newest comments. This model of last bump only works if activity is fairly low.
Skavau@piefed.social 19 hours ago
That's still disordered and just encourages people to bump their own threads.
The upvote/downvote system is foundational to sites like this. Short of a new, more advanced voting system (which is a long way out) it's not going anywhere. If you don't want to look at it like that, you can always default all of your own feeds and threads to /new/.