I think that, perhaps, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the generally accepted (speaking for the US here) definition of the conservative political ideology actually is.
Modern conservatives do not care about conserving the environment. Literally the opposite.
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
I know what the generally accepted definition is, I just don’t accept it. Regressives don’t have a right to call themselves conservative and I won’t stop calling them out on it.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 hours ago
You really don’t have to accept it in order for it to be our current reality.
What is the point of labels like this if they don’t signal what it is you believe, relatively accurately?
Nemo@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
This is exactly why it’s necessary to push back on those who would twist it to mean something else.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 hours ago
I think you’re about 80 years too late for that. At least.
onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
But conservatives have always been regressive in the US.
aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Conservatives have always been regressive, period. Their entire philosophy emerged from the “excesses” of the French Revolution. The forward “movement” (if you want to call it that) was from the “divine right of kings” to the “divine right of lords (chosen by the market)”.
To quote the infinitely quotable (Wilhout, from the top rope…with a fucking blog comment):
I understand the desire to take the positive aspects of a word, apply them to your political stance, and pretend that you’re part of a movement. But it isn’t true. It reminds me of when lefties (in often an USA centric thread) describe themselves as “left libertarians” all this crap does is confuse people and make you sound like a pedant.
If you think this is what conservative means, you’re basically just politically homeless…and have been since you started calling yourself that.
Nemo@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
This, at least, is correct.