Comment on User "threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works" is banning users for downvoting his posts.

• socsa@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Piefed's original surge in popularity was arguably due to the main dev quickly implementing a voting agent function for pseudonymous voting. It wasn't perfect but it worked quite well until a bunch of other admins got butthurt about it and basically convinced rimu to abandon the idea in some discord back channels.

  I have been vocal about my opinion that this was a mistake, and that public voting is the number one biggest issue with the fediverse at the moment (besides tankies, but that's a problem which will wither away with more users). Nothing good can come out of public voting though. People have this idea that it's some panacea for vote manipulation, but there are way better ways to handle that than IMO

  source

  • Blaze@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Piefed’s original surge in popularity was arguably due to the main dev quickly implementing a voting agent function for pseudonymous voting.

    Piefed’s urge came from crossposts comments consolidation, keyword filters, posts flairs, community migration and lemm.ee shutdown

    The private voting was marginal

    source

    • socsa@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It was absolutely the reason why I switched. I know several other people who made accounts for the same reason.

      source
  • Skavau@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    No, the original surge in popularity was a combination of its features and collapse of lemm.ee. I don't think the downvoting policy had much to do with it.

    source
  • goat@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I regularly get vote manipulation in my community and on my account. What are some ways to better handle that?

    source

    • socsa@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Mostly I'm talking about various algorithmic ways to diminish or eliminate the influence of downvotes for post ranking purposes. Nothing that can be done without forking Lemmy or piefed unfortunately. Even something like downvotes don't actually rank posts, but enough of them will auto-report content would be better than what we have.

      It's unfortunate that nobody wants to put serious effort into this kind of thing though, because it feels like admins are addicted to the tiny amount of insider power which comes with watching public votes, so there's no incentive to implement features which might allow closing that obnoxious privacy hole.

      source

      • wjs018@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Piefed has an open issue to look at improvements to the ranking/scoring algorithms. So, we are open to improvements on that end if there are suggestions.

        source
      • Blaze@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        enough of them will auto-report content would be better than what we have.

        Seems like an easy abuse case: once the threshold is known, people can create auto reports using puppet accounts, that can’t be identified due to anonymous voting

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • goat@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Too often are the devs busy with moderating and removing content critical of their ideology instead of development

        source

        • -> View More Comments